Arc Graphics 130T vs Radeon RX 6300M
Arc Graphics 130T
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6300M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 130T is positioned at rank 239 and the Radeon RX 6300M is on rank 98, so the Radeon RX 6300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130T
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 130T.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%) |
| Longevity | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 130T and Radeon RX 6300M
Arc Graphics 130T
The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
Radeon RX 6300M
The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 130T scores 6,208 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130T is built on Xe+ while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 6,421+3% |
| Architecture | Xe+ | RDNA 2.0 |
| Shading Units | 7 | 768+10871% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc Graphics 130T lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 130T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300M has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 6300M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 32-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 64 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 32-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs Navi 24 Media. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | — |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | Navi 24 Media |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 130T draws 15W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 80% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-57% | 35W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 413.9+126% | 183.5 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 130T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | — |
| Codename | — | Navi 24 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #386 | #379 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 130T and Radeon RX 6300M
