Arc Graphics 130T vs Quadro P3000
Arc Graphics 130T
Popular choices:
Quadro P3000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 130T is positioned at rank 239 and the Quadro P3000 is on rank 135, so the Quadro P3000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130T
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 130T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2016). The Arc Graphics 130T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P3000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P3000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (6 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 130T.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) |
| Longevity | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P3000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $250 for the Arc Graphics 130T, it costs 68% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 221.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+221.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 130T and Quadro P3000
Arc Graphics 130T
The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
Quadro P3000
The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 130T scores 6,208 and the Quadro P3000 reaches 6,384 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130T is built on Xe+ while the Quadro P3000 uses Pascal. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 3,840 (Quadro P3000).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 6,384+3% |
| Architecture | Xe+ | Pascal |
| Shading Units | 7 | 3840+54757% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 130T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3000 has 6 GB. The Quadro P3000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P3000).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 130T draws 15W versus the Quadro P3000's 250W — a 177.4% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 350W (Quadro P3000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-94% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 413.9+1523% | 25.5 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 130T launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Quadro P3000 launched at $600 and now averages $80. The Quadro P3000 costs 68% less ($170 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.8 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 79.8 (Quadro P3000) — the Quadro P3000 offers 221.8% better value. The Arc Graphics 130T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-50% | $600 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $80-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.8 | 79.8+222% |
| Codename | — | GP102 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #386 | #141 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 130T and Quadro P3000
