Arc Graphics 130T vs Quadro P3000

Arc Graphics 130T vs Quadro P3000 Performance Spectrum

Arc Graphics 130T

Shared 15

6,208

0.0%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Arc Graphics 130V

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

6,384

+2.8%

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 130T vs Quadro P3000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc Graphics 130T vs Quadro P3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 130T

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 94.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Quadro P3000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Arc Graphics 130T is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 15W instead of 250W, a 235W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quadro P3000

2016

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
100% HIGHER MSRP
$600 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌1566.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P3000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (6,384 vs 6,208), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc Graphics 130T is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2025 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc Graphics 130T makes the most sense to buy today. It is $300 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $600, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 94.5% (20.7 vs 10.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro P3000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc Graphics 130T vs Quadro P3000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc Graphics 130T

The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Quadro P3000

The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 130T scores 6,208 and the Quadro P3000 reaches 6,384 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130T is built on Xe+ while the Quadro P3000 uses Pascal. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 3,840 (Quadro P3000).

Feature	Arc Graphics 130T	Quadro P3000
G3D Mark Score	6,208	6,384+3%
Architecture	Xe+	Pascal
Shading Units	7	3840+54757%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc Graphics 130T	Quadro P3000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 130T has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3000 carries 6 GB. Quadro P3000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 130T and 256-bit on the Quadro P3000.

Feature	Arc Graphics 130T	Quadro P3000
VRAM Capacity	Shared	6 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Bus Width	System	256-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	Arc Graphics 130T	Quadro P3000
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P3000).

Feature	Arc Graphics 130T	Quadro P3000
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266	H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 130T draws 15W versus the Quadro P3000's 250W — a 177.4% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 350W (Quadro P3000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Arc Graphics 130T	Quadro P3000
TDP	15W-94%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	413.9+1523%	25.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc Graphics 130T came in at $300, while the Quadro P3000 launched at $600. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 130T was 50% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 10.6 (Quadro P3000) — the Arc Graphics 130T offers 95.3% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 130T (2025 vs 2016).

Feature	Arc Graphics 130T	Quadro P3000
MSRP	$300-50%	$600
Performance per Dollar	20.7+95%	10.6
Codename	—	GP102
Release	January 6 2025	October 1 2016
Ranking	#386	#141

Search Arc Graphics 130T on Amazon

Search Quadro P3000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.