Arc Graphics 130T vs Quadro M4000M
Arc Graphics 130T
Popular choices:
Quadro M4000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 130T is positioned at rank 239 and the Quadro M4000M is on rank 4, so the Quadro M4000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130T
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M4000M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 130T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The Arc Graphics 130T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M4000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 130T is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M4000M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc Graphics 130T remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 130T and Quadro M4000M
Arc Graphics 130T
The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
Quadro M4000M
The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 130T scores 6,208 and the Quadro M4000M reaches 6,148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130T is built on Xe+ while the Quadro M4000M uses Maxwell 2.0. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 1 (Quadro M4000M).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 6,148 |
| Architecture | Xe+ | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Shading Units | 7 | 1,280+18186% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 130T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro M4000M has 4 GB. The Quadro M4000M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130T) vs NVENC 5 (Quadro M4000M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX (Quadro M4000M).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 5 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 1 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 130T draws 15W versus the Quadro M4000M's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 350W (Quadro M4000M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-85% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 413.9+573% | 61.5 |
Value Analysis
The Arc Graphics 130T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | — |
| Codename | — | GM204 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #386 | #392 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc Graphics 130T and Quadro M4000M
