Arc Graphics 130T vs Quadro M4000M

Intel

Arc Graphics 130T

2025
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M4000M

2015Core: 975 MHzBoost: 1013 MHz
Similar parts
··

Arc Graphics 130T vs Quadro M4000M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc Graphics 130T vs Quadro M4000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc Graphics 130T

2025

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Quadro M4000M is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Arc Graphics 130T is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quadro M4000M

2015

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc Graphics 130T is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (6,208 vs 6,148), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc Graphics 130T is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2025 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 130T makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Arc Graphics 130T vs Quadro M4000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc Graphics 130T

The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro M4000M

The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 130T scores 6,208 and the Quadro M4000M reaches 6,148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130T is built on Xe+ while the Quadro M4000M uses Maxwell 2.0. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 1 (Quadro M4000M).

FeatureArc Graphics 130TQuadro M4000M
G3D Mark Score
6,208
6,148
Architecture
Xe+
Maxwell 2.0
Shading Units
7
1,280+18186%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc Graphics 130TQuadro M4000M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 130T has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro M4000M carries 4 GB. Quadro M4000M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 130T and 256-bit on the Quadro M4000M.

FeatureArc Graphics 130TQuadro M4000M
VRAM Capacity
Shared
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Bus Width
System
256-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureArc Graphics 130TQuadro M4000M
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130T) vs NVENC 5 (Quadro M4000M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX (Quadro M4000M).

FeatureArc Graphics 130TQuadro M4000M
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
NVENC 5
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
NVDEC 1
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 130T draws 15W versus the Quadro M4000M's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 350W (Quadro M4000M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureArc Graphics 130TQuadro M4000M
TDP
15W-85%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
413.9+573%
61.5
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc Graphics 130T (2025 vs 2015).

FeatureArc Graphics 130TQuadro M4000M
MSRP
$300
Codename
GM204
Release
January 6 2025
August 18 2015
Ranking
#386
#392

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.