
Arc Graphics 130T

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Arc Graphics 130T vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc Graphics 130T vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Arc Graphics 130T vs Radeon Pro WX 7130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc Graphics 130T
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 223% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Radeon Pro WX 7130 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Arc Graphics 130T is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Radeon Pro WX 7130
2016Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌233.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc Graphics 130T vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc Graphics 130T
The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The Arc Graphics 130T scores 6,208 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130T is built on Xe+ while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 6,406+3% |
| Architecture | Xe+ | GCN 4.0 |
| Shading Units | 7 | 2304+32814% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc Graphics 130T has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 7130 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Arc Graphics 130T and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 7130.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130T) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc Graphics 130T draws 15W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 158.6% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-88% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 413.9+740% | 49.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc Graphics 130T came in at $300, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000. On MSRP, Arc Graphics 130T was 70% cheaper ($700 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Arc Graphics 130T offers 223.4% better value. The newer card here is Arc Graphics 130T (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | Arc Graphics 130T | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-70% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7+223% | 6.4 |
| Codename | — | Ellesmere |
| Release | January 6 2025 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #386 | #331 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















