Arc Graphics 130T
VS
Tesla M6

Arc Graphics 130T vs Tesla M6

Intel

Arc Graphics 130T

2025
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M6

2015Core: 930 MHzBoost: 1180 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Arc Graphics 130T is positioned at rank 239 and the Tesla M6 is on rank 188, so the Tesla M6 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130T

#54
Radeon RX 6800S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
96%
#229
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
525%
#231
476%
#232
474%
#236
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
431%
#237
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
428%
#239
Arc Graphics 130T
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
100%
#240
GeForce MX570 A
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#242
GeForce GT 645
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
98%
#252
GeForce 720A
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
93%
#253
GeForce GT 520M
MSRP: $60|Avg: N/A
91%
#254
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla M6

#82
RTX A5000
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800
99%
#83
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200
98%
#84
Radeon PRO V710
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
96%
#85
RTX A5500
MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200
94%
#86
Radeon Pro WX 9100
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550
89%
#87
A10G
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000
87%
#173
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2371%
#188
Tesla M6
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84
100%
#190
CMP 30HX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $60
98%
#191
FirePro W2100
MSRP: $139|Avg: $30
98%
#193
FirePro M6000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
97%
#196
FirePro M4170
MSRP: $200|Avg: $80
94%
#197
GRID K140Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $500
93%
#200
Radeon Pro Duo
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $799
89%
#201
P102-100
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
88%
#203
Quadro FX 2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Arc Graphics 130T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The Arc Graphics 130T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla M6 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Tesla M6 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 130T.

InsightArc Graphics 130TTesla M6
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Longevity
Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Tesla M6 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $84 versus $250 for the Arc Graphics 130T, it costs 66% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 198.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightArc Graphics 130TTesla M6
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+198.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250)
More affordable ($84)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 130T and Tesla M6

Intel

Arc Graphics 130T

The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla M6

The Tesla M6 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,225 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 130T scores 6,208 and the Tesla M6 reaches 6,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130T is built on Xe+ while the Tesla M6 uses Maxwell 2.0. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 1,536 (Tesla M6).

FeatureArc Graphics 130TTesla M6
G3D Mark Score
6,208
6,225
Architecture
Xe+
Maxwell 2.0
Shading Units
7
1536+21843%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc Graphics 130TTesla M6
Upscaling Tech
XeSS
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 130T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla M6 has 4 GB. The Tesla M6 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit.

FeatureArc Graphics 130TTesla M6
VRAM Capacity
Shared
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Bus Width
System
256-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 12 (Tesla M6). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureArc Graphics 130TTesla M6
DirectX
12.2+2%
12
Max Displays
3
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130T) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Tesla M6). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.

FeatureArc Graphics 130TTesla M6
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
NVENC 5th Gen
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
NVDEC 2nd Gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 130T draws 15W versus the Tesla M6's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 350W (Tesla M6). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureArc Graphics 130TTesla M6
TDP
15W-85%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
1mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
413.9+564%
62.3
💰

Value Analysis

The Arc Graphics 130T launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Tesla M6 launched at $1000 and now averages $84. The Tesla M6 costs 66.4% less ($166 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.8 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 74.1 (Tesla M6) — the Tesla M6 offers 198.8% better value. The Arc Graphics 130T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).

FeatureArc Graphics 130TTesla M6
MSRP
$300-70%
$1000
Avg Price (30d)
$250
$84-66%
Performance per Dollar
24.8
74.1+199%
Codename
GM204
Release
January 6 2025
August 30 2015
Ranking
#386
#388