
FirePro W9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

FirePro W9000
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W9000 is positioned at rank #317 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W9000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W9000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro W9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (279mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $150), it costs 57% less, resulting in a 138% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+138%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($65) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W9000 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

FirePro W9000
The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W9000 scores 6,157 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti reaches 6,350 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W9000) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000) vs 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,157 | 6,350+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.994 TFLOPS+87% | 2.138 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+167% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+78% | 288 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W9000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has 4 GB. The FirePro W9000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro W9000) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9000) vs 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W9000) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W9000) vs H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W9000 draws 274W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti's 70W — a 118.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9000) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 279mm vs 211mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 70W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 279mm | 211mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 93°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.5 | 90.7+303% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W9000 launched at $3999 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 and now averages $65. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti costs 56.7% less ($85 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.0 (FirePro W9000) vs 97.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 138.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3999 | $140-96% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $65-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.0 | 97.7+138% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GP107 |
| Release | June 14 2012 | October 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #390 | #381 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















