FirePro W9000
VS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

FirePro W9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

FirePro W9000

2012Core: 975 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

2016Core: 1291 MHzBoost: 1392 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro W9000 is positioned at rank #317 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W9000

#302
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9593%
#317
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
100%
#318
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
99%
#319
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
99%
#320
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
99%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
98%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
96%
#323
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
92%
#324
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
92%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
90%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
90%
#327
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
89%
#328
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
89%
#329
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
86%
#330
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
84%
#331
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W9000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%)
Leading raw performance (+3.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (279mm)
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $150), it costs 57% less, resulting in a 138% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+138%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)
More affordable ($65)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W9000 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

AMD

FirePro W9000

The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W9000 scores 6,157 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti reaches 6,350 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W9000) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000) vs 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti).

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
G3D Mark Score
6,157
6,350+3%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+167%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.994 TFLOPS+87%
2.138 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+167%
48
L1 Cache
512 KB+78%
288 KB
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W9000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has 4 GB. The FirePro W9000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro W9000) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9000) vs 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
DirectX
12
12_1
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W9000) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W9000) vs H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti).

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder
UVD 3.2
NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W9000 draws 274W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti's 70W — a 118.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9000) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 279mm vs 211mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
TDP
274W
70W-74%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
279mm
211mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
93°C
Perf/Watt
22.5
90.7+303%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W9000 launched at $3999 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 and now averages $65. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti costs 56.7% less ($85 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.0 (FirePro W9000) vs 97.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 138.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
MSRP
$3999
$140-96%
Avg Price (30d)
$150
$65-57%
Performance per Dollar
41.0
97.7+138%
Codename
Tahiti
GP107
Release
June 14 2012
October 25 2016
Ranking
#390
#381