Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro W9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro W9000

2012Core: 975 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

2016Core: 1291 MHzBoost: 1392 MHz
Buy on Amazon

FirePro W9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Performance Spectrum

FirePro W9000
6 GB 274
6,157
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD8970M
brand logoRadeon RX 460 (móvel)
brand logoRadeon RX 560X (móvel)
brand logoRadeon 760M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 7650 GRE
brand logoRadeon RX 7900M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
4 GB 70
6,350
+3.1%
brand logoGeForce GTX 870M
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 760
brand logoGeForce GTX 680
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W9000

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    2756.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,999 MSRPvs$140 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 45.4 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
  • ❌291.4% higher power demand at 274W vs 70W.
  • ❌32.2% longer card at 279mm vs 211mm.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

2016

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $3,859 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 2846% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.4 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 70W instead of 274W, a 204W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 211mm instead of 279mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.1% in PassMark G3D (6,350 vs 6,157), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W9000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,859 cheaper on MSRP at $140 vs $3,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2846% (45.4 vs 1.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W9000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W9000

The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W9000 scores 6,157 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti reaches 6,350 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W9000) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000) vs 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti).

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
G3D Mark Score
6,157
6,350+3%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+167%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.994 TFLOPS+87%
2.138 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+167%
48
L1 Cache
512 KB+78%
288 KB
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W9000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti carries 4 GB. FirePro W9000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W9000 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro W9000) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9000) vs 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
DirectX
12
12_1
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W9000) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W9000) vs H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti).

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder
UVD 3.2
NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W9000 draws 274W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti's 70W — a 118.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9000) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 279mm vs 211mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
TDP
274W
70W-74%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
279mm
211mm
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
93°C
—
Perf/Watt
22.5
90.7+303%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W9000 came in at $3999, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti was 96.5% cheaper ($3859 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (FirePro W9000) vs 45.4 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 2926.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
MSRP
$3999
$140-96%
Performance per Dollar
1.5
45.4+2927%
Codename
Tahiti
GP107
Release
June 14 2012
October 25 2016
Ranking
#390
#381
Search FirePro W9000 on AmazonSearch GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.