
FirePro W9000 vs Tesla M6

FirePro W9000
Popular choices:

Tesla M6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W9000 is positioned at rank 317 and the Tesla M6 is on rank 188, so the Tesla M6 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W9000
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M6
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla M6 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W9000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro W9000 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (279mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla M6 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla M6 holds the technical lead. Priced at $84 (vs $150), it costs 44% less, resulting in a 80.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W9000 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+80.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($84) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W9000 and Tesla M6

FirePro W9000
The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Tesla M6
The Tesla M6 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,225 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W9000 scores 6,157 and the Tesla M6 reaches 6,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla M6 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W9000) vs 1,536 (Tesla M6). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000) vs 3.625 TFLOPS (Tesla M6).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,157 | 6,225+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.994 TFLOPS+10% | 3.625 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128+33% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 576 KB+13% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W9000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M6 has 4 GB. The FirePro W9000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro W9000) vs 2 MB (Tesla M6) — the Tesla M6 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9000) vs 12 (Tesla M6). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W9000) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Tesla M6). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 5th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | NVDEC 2nd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W9000 draws 274W versus the Tesla M6's 100W — a 93% difference. The Tesla M6 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9000) vs 350W (Tesla M6). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 279mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 100W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 93°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.5 | 62.3+177% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W9000 launched at $3999 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Tesla M6 launched at $1000 and now averages $84. The Tesla M6 costs 44% less ($66 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.0 (FirePro W9000) vs 74.1 (Tesla M6) — the Tesla M6 offers 80.7% better value. The Tesla M6 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3999 | $1000-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $84-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.0 | 74.1+81% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GM204 |
| Release | June 14 2012 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #390 | #388 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















