Arc A380 vs FirePro W9000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A380 vs FirePro W9000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Arc A380 vs FirePro W9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A380
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2646.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 42.3 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 274W, a 199W reduction.
- ✅Measures 190mm instead of 279mm, a 89mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
FirePro W9000
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌2583.9% HIGHER MSRP$3,999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 42.3 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌265.3% higher power demand at 274W vs 75W.
- ❌46.8% longer card at 279mm vs 190mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A380 vs FirePro W9000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A380
The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.

FirePro W9000
The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A380 scores 6,301 and the FirePro W9000 reaches 6,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A380 is built on Generation 12.7 while the FirePro W9000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A380) vs 2,048 (FirePro W9000). Raw compute: 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380) vs 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000).
| Feature | Arc A380 | FirePro W9000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,301+2% | 6,157 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.198 TFLOPS+5% | 3.994 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+433% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A380 | FirePro W9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 6 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the Arc A380 and 256-bit on the FirePro W9000. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A380) vs 0.75 MB (FirePro W9000) — the Arc A380 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A380 | FirePro W9000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+433% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A380) vs 12 (FirePro W9000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Arc A380 | FirePro W9000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A380) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W9000). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A380) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W9000).
| Feature | Arc A380 | FirePro W9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A380 draws 75W versus the FirePro W9000's 274W — a 114% difference. The Arc A380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A380) vs 350W (FirePro W9000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 190mm vs 279mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 59 vs 93°C.
| Feature | Arc A380 | FirePro W9000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-73% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 190mm | 279mm |
| Height | 114mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 59-37% | 93°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.0+273% | 22.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Arc A380 came in at $149, while the FirePro W9000 launched at $3999. On MSRP, Arc A380 was 96.3% cheaper ($3850 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 42.3 (Arc A380) vs 1.5 (FirePro W9000) — the Arc A380 offers 2720% better value. The newer card here is Arc A380 (2022 vs 2012).
| Feature | Arc A380 | FirePro W9000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-96% | $3999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.3+2720% | 1.5 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | Tahiti |
| Release | June 14 2022 | June 14 2012 |
| Ranking | #384 | #390 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















