Arc A380 vs Radeon RX 6300M
Arc A380
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6300M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A380
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A380 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc A380 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A380 and Radeon RX 6300M
Arc A380
The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.
Radeon RX 6300M
The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A380 scores 6,301 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A380 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A380) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Arc A380) vs 12 (Radeon RX 6300M) with 128 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Arc A380 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,301 | 6,421+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+33% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.198 TFLOPS+14% | 3.686 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz | 2400 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64+33% | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | 12+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A380 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Arc A380 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A380 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300M has 4 GB. The Arc A380 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 186 GB/s (Arc A380) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300M) — a 190.6% advantage for the Arc A380. Bus width: 96-bit vs 32-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A380) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) — the Arc A380 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A380 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 186 GB/s+191% | 64 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+200% | 32-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A380) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Arc A380 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs Navi 24 Media. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A380) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M).
| Feature | Arc A380 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | — |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | Navi 24 Media |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A380 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A380) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 59 vs 70°C.
| Feature | Arc A380 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 35W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 190mm | — |
| Height | 114mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 59-16% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.0 | 183.5+118% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A380 and Radeon RX 6300M
