Arc A380 vs Radeon RX 6300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A380 vs Radeon RX 6300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A380 vs Radeon RX 6300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A380

2022

Why buy it

✅24.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 42.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Radeon RX 6300M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A380 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 42.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A380 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 24.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 6300M instead at 6,421 vs 6,301, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Arc A380 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support and 12 vs 8 ray-tracing units. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A380 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Arc A380 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 6300M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A380 vs Radeon RX 6300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A380

The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A380 scores 6,301 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A380 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A380) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Arc A380) vs 12 (Radeon RX 6300M) with 128 Tensor cores.

Feature	Arc A380	Radeon RX 6300M
G3D Mark Score	6,301	6,421+2%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1024+33%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.198 TFLOPS+14%	3.686 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2050 MHz	2400 MHz+17%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64+33%	48
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	8	12+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Arc A380 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Arc A380	Radeon RX 6300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A380 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300M carries 4 GB. Arc A380 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 186 GB/s (Arc A380) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300M) — a 190.6% advantage for the Arc A380. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the Arc A380 and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300M. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A380) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) — the Arc A380 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A380	Radeon RX 6300M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	186 GB/s+191%	64 GB/s
Bus Width	96-bit+200%	32-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A380) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Arc A380	Radeon RX 6300M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs Navi 24 Media. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A380) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M).

Feature	Arc A380	Radeon RX 6300M
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	—
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	Navi 24 Media
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A380 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A380) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 59 vs 70°C.

Feature	Arc A380	Radeon RX 6300M
TDP	75W	35W-53%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	190mm	—
Height	114mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	59-16%	70°C
Perf/Watt	84.0	183.5+118%