Arc A380 vs Quadro P3000
Arc A380
Popular choices:
Quadro P3000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A380
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc A380 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2016). The Arc A380 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P3000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P3000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A380.
| Insight | Arc A380 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P3000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $119 for the Arc A380, it costs 33% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 50.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc A380 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+50.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($119) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A380 and Quadro P3000
Arc A380
The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.
Quadro P3000
The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A380 scores 6,301 and the Quadro P3000 reaches 6,384 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A380 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro P3000 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A380) vs 3,840 (Quadro P3000). Raw compute: 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A380 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,301 | 6,384+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 3840+275% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.198 TFLOPS | 12.63 TFLOPS+201% |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+25% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 64 | 240+275% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A380 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A380) vs 3 MB (Quadro P3000) — the Arc A380 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A380 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A380) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A380 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A380) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A380) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P3000).
| Feature | Arc A380 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A380 draws 75W versus the Quadro P3000's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The Arc A380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A380) vs 350W (Quadro P3000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 59 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc A380 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 190mm | — |
| Height | 114mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 59-26% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.0+229% | 25.5 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A380 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $119, while the Quadro P3000 launched at $600 and now averages $80. The Quadro P3000 costs 32.8% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 52.9 (Arc A380) vs 79.8 (Quadro P3000) — the Quadro P3000 offers 50.9% better value. The Arc A380 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Arc A380 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-75% | $600 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $119 | $80-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.9 | 79.8+51% |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GP102 |
| Release | June 14 2022 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #384 | #141 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A380 and Quadro P3000
