Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Intel

Arc A380

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz
Arc family
···
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

2016Core: 1291 MHzBoost: 1392 MHz
GTX family
·······

Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A380

2022

Why buy it

  • 35.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Measures 190mm instead of 211mm, a 21mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 6.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $149 MSRPvs$140 MSRP

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $9 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Arc A380 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 11.1% longer card at 211mm vs 190mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc A380 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 35.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1050 Ti instead at 6,350 vs 6,301, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A380 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $9 cheaper on MSRP at $140 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 7.3% (45.4 vs 42.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A380 has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A380

The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A380 scores 6,301 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti reaches 6,350 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A380 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A380) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Raw compute: 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380) vs 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1392 MHz.

FeatureArc A380GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
G3D Mark Score
6,301
6,350
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Pascal
Process Node
6 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1024+33%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.198 TFLOPS+96%
2.138 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2050 MHz+47%
1392 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64+33%
48
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A380 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureArc A380GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A380 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti carries 4 GB. Arc A380 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 186 GB/s (Arc A380) vs 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) — a 66.1% advantage for the Arc A380. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the Arc A380 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A380) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) — the Arc A380 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A380GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
186 GB/s+66%
112 GB/s
Bus Width
96-bit
128-bit+33%
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A380) vs 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureArc A380GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12_1
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A380) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A380) vs H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti).

FeatureArc A380GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Encoder
Xe Media Engine
NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs
AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A380 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti's 70W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A380) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 190mm vs 211mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureArc A380GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
TDP
75W
70W-7%
Recommended PSU
300W
300W
Power Connector
None
None
Length
190mm
211mm
Height
114mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
59
Perf/Watt
84.0
90.7+8%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A380 came in at $149, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti was 6% cheaper ($9 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 42.3 (Arc A380) vs 45.4 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 7.3% better value. The newer card here is Arc A380 (2022 vs 2016).

FeatureArc A380GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
MSRP
$149
$140-6%
Performance per Dollar
42.3
45.4+7%
Codename
DG2-128
GP107
Release
June 14 2022
October 25 2016
Ranking
#384
#381

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.