Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

CPU

GPU

Arc A380

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz

Arc family

···

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

2019Core: 930 MHzBoost: 1125 MHz

GTX family

····

Buy on Amazon

Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q Performance Spectrum

Arc A380

6 GB 75

6,301

0.0%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Arc Graphics 130V

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

Arc A770M

Arc B580

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

4 GB 30

6,314

+0.2%

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A380

2022

Why buy it

✅17.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 42.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A380 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 42.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A380 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q instead at 6,314 vs 6,301, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A380 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 12nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A380 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Arc A380 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A380

The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,314 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A380 scores 6,301 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q reaches 6,314 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A380 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A380) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Raw compute: 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1125 MHz.

Feature	Arc A380	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	6,301	6,314
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Turing
Process Node	6 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1024	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.198 TFLOPS+82%	2.304 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2050 MHz+82%	1125 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	64
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A380 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Arc A380	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A380 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q carries 4 GB. Arc A380 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 186 GB/s (Arc A380) vs 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) — a 66.1% advantage for the Arc A380. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the Arc A380 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A380) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) — the Arc A380 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A380	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	186 GB/s+66%	112 GB/s
Bus Width	96-bit	128-bit+33%
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A380) vs 12 (11_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A380	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A380) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A380) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q).

Feature	Arc A380	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	NVENC (Turing)
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	NVDEC (4th Gen)
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A380 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A380) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 59 vs 75°C.

Feature	Arc A380	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
TDP	75W	30W-60%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	190mm	—
Height	114mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	59-21%	75°C
Perf/Watt	84.0	210.5+151%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A380 (2022 vs 2019).

Feature	Arc A380	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
MSRP	$149	—
Codename	DG2-128	TU117
Release	June 14 2022	April 23 2019
Ranking	#384	#383

Search Arc A380 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.