Arc A380 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130

CPU

GPU

Arc A380

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz

Arc family

···

Buy on Amazon

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016Core: 1188 MHzBoost: 1243 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Arc A380 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 Performance Spectrum

Arc A380

6 GB 75

6,301

0.0%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Arc Graphics 130V

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

6,406

+1.7%

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

Radeon R9 M395

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A380 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A380 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A380

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 560.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 42.3 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7130 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016

Why buy it

✅23.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
571.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 42.3 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX 7130 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (6,406 vs 6,301), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A380 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A380 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $851 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 560.1% (42.3 vs 6.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro WX 7130 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc A380 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A380

The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A380 scores 6,301 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A380 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A380) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Raw compute: 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1243 MHz.

Feature	Arc A380	Radeon Pro WX 7130
G3D Mark Score	6,301	6,406+2%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN 4.0
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1024	2304+125%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.198 TFLOPS	5.728 TFLOPS+36%
Boost Clock	2050 MHz+65%	1243 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	144+125%
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A380	Radeon Pro WX 7130
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A380 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 7130 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the Arc A380 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 7130. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A380) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Arc A380 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A380	Radeon Pro WX 7130
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	96-bit	128-bit+33%
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A380) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A380	Radeon Pro WX 7130
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A380) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A380) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130).

Feature	Arc A380	Radeon Pro WX 7130
Encoder	Xe Media Engine	VCE 3.4
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	UVD 6.3
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A380 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 53.7% difference. The Arc A380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A380) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 59 vs 85°C.

Feature	Arc A380	Radeon Pro WX 7130
TDP	75W-42%	130W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	190mm	—
Height	114mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	59-31%	85°C
Perf/Watt	84.0+70%	49.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A380 came in at $149, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000. On MSRP, Arc A380 was 85.1% cheaper ($851 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 42.3 (Arc A380) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Arc A380 offers 560.9% better value. The newer card here is Arc A380 (2022 vs 2016).

Feature	Arc A380	Radeon Pro WX 7130
MSRP	$149-85%	$1000
Performance per Dollar	42.3+561%	6.4
Codename	DG2-128	Ellesmere
Release	June 14 2022	November 10 2016
Ranking	#384	#331

Search Arc A380 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 7130 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.