
FirePro W9000 vs Radeon Pro 570

FirePro W9000
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W9000 is positioned at rank 317 and the Radeon Pro 570 is on rank 78, so the Radeon Pro 570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W9000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W9000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro W9000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (279mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro 570 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $150), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 54.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W9000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+54.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W9000 and Radeon Pro 570

FirePro W9000
The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W9000 scores 6,157 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W9000) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,157 | 6,337+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+14% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.994 TFLOPS | 3.96 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+14% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+14% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W9000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 570 has 4 GB. The FirePro W9000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro W9000) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W9000 draws 274W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 78.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 120W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 93°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.5 | 52.8+135% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W9000 launched at $3999 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300 and now averages $100. The Radeon Pro 570 costs 33.3% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.0 (FirePro W9000) vs 63.4 (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 54.6% better value. The Radeon Pro 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3999 | $300-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $100-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.0 | 63.4+55% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Polaris 20 |
| Release | June 14 2012 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #390 | #382 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















