FirePro W9000 vs GeForce MX570 A

FirePro W9000

2012Core: 975 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce MX570 A

2022Core: 832 MHzBoost: 1155 MHz
Similar parts
··

FirePro W9000 vs GeForce MX570 A Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W9000 vs GeForce MX570 A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W9000

2012

Why buy it

  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 1233% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,999 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 20.7 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 996% higher power demand at 274W vs 25W.

GeForce MX570 A

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $3,699 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1244% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 25W instead of 274W, a 249W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce MX570 A is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (6,208 vs 6,157), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce MX570 A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX570 A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,699 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $3,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1244% (20.7 vs 1.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro W9000 vs GeForce MX570 A Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W9000

The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

NVIDIA

GeForce MX570 A

The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W9000 scores 6,157 and the GeForce MX570 A reaches 6,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce MX570 A uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W9000) vs 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A).

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce MX570 A
G3D Mark Score
6,157
6,208
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2048
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.994 TFLOPS
4.731 TFLOPS+18%
ROPs
32
40+25%
TMUs
128+100%
64
L1 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
2 MB+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX570 A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce MX570 A
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W9000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX570 A carries 4 GB. FirePro W9000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W9000 and 64-bit on the GeForce MX570 A. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro W9000) vs 2 MB (GeForce MX570 A) — the GeForce MX570 A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce MX570 A
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
2 MB+167%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W9000 draws 274W versus the GeForce MX570 A's 25W — a 166.6% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9000) vs 350W (GeForce MX570 A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce MX570 A
TDP
274W
25W-91%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
279mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
93°C
Perf/Watt
22.5
248.3+1004%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W9000 came in at $3999, while the GeForce MX570 A launched at $300. On MSRP, GeForce MX570 A was 92.5% cheaper ($3699 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (FirePro W9000) vs 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) — the GeForce MX570 A offers 1280% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX570 A (2022 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro W9000GeForce MX570 A
MSRP
$3999
$300-92%
Performance per Dollar
1.5
20.7+1280%
Codename
Tahiti
GA107
Release
June 14 2012
Maio 2022
Ranking
#390
#387

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.