FirePro W9000 vs GeForce MX570 A
FirePro W9000
Popular choices:
GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W9000 is positioned at rank 317 and the GeForce MX570 A is on rank 239, so the GeForce MX570 A offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W9000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570 A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce MX570 A is significantly newer (2022 vs 2012). The GeForce MX570 A likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W9000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX570 A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W9000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro W9000 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (279mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W9000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $300 for the GeForce MX570 A, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 98.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W9000 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+98.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W9000 and GeForce MX570 A
FirePro W9000
The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.
GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W9000 scores 6,157 and the GeForce MX570 A reaches 6,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce MX570 A uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W9000) vs 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A). Raw compute: 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,157 | 6,208 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.994 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS+18% |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W9000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX570 A has 4 GB. The FirePro W9000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro W9000) vs 2 MB (GeForce MX570 A) — the GeForce MX570 A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W9000 draws 274W versus the GeForce MX570 A's 25W — a 166.6% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9000) vs 350W (GeForce MX570 A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 25W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 279mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 93°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.5 | 248.3+1004% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W9000 launched at $3999 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce MX570 A launched at $300 and now averages $300. The FirePro W9000 costs 50% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 41.0 (FirePro W9000) vs 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) — the FirePro W9000 offers 98.1% better value. The GeForce MX570 A is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3999 | $300-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-50% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.0+98% | 20.7 |
| Codename | Tahiti | GA107 |
| Release | June 14 2012 | Maio 2022 |
| Ranking | #390 | #387 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W9000 and GeForce MX570 A
