Quadro K5200 vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K5200 vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K5200 vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K5200

2014

Why buy it

✅9.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌650% higher power demand at 150W vs 20W.

RTX A500 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 20W instead of 150W, a 130W reduction.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K5200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K5200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX A500 Embedded GPU instead at 6,197 vs 6,149, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A500 Embedded GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K5200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K5200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX A500 Embedded GPU has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K5200 vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K5200

The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.

RTX A500 Embedded GPU

The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5200 scores 6,149 and the RTX A500 Embedded GPU reaches 6,197 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5200 is built on Kepler while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro K5200) vs 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200) vs 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 771 MHz vs 1335 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K5200	RTX A500 Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score	6,149	6,197
Architecture	Kepler	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	2304+13%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.553 TFLOPS	5.468 TFLOPS+54%
Boost Clock	771 MHz	1335 MHz+73%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	192+200%	64

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A500 Embedded GPU gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K5200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Quadro K5200	RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K5200 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU carries 4 GB. Quadro K5200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro K5200 and 128-bit on the RTX A500 Embedded GPU.

Feature	Quadro K5200	RTX A500 Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5200 draws 150W versus the RTX A500 Embedded GPU's 20W — a 152.9% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5200) vs 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K5200	RTX A500 Embedded GPU
TDP	150W	20W-87%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	82mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	41.0	309.9+656%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX A500 Embedded GPU (2022 vs 2014).

Feature	Quadro K5200	RTX A500 Embedded GPU
MSRP	$2250	—
Codename	GK110B	GA107S
Release	July 22 2014	March 30 2022
Ranking	#391	#389

Search Quadro K5200 on Amazon

Search RTX A500 Embedded GPU on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.