GeForce MX570 A vs Quadro K5200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX570 A is positioned at rank 239 and the Quadro K5200 is on rank 254, so the GeForce MX570 A offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570 A

#54

Radeon RX 6800S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

96%

#228

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

525%

#230

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

476%

#231

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

474%

#235

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

431%

#236

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

428%

#238

Arc Graphics 130T

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

100%

#239

GeForce MX570 A

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

100%

#241

GeForce GT 645

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

98%

#251

GeForce 720A

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

93%

#252

GeForce GT 520M

MSRP: $60|Avg: N/A

91%

#253

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE

MSRP: $99|Avg: $60

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5200

#106

L40S

MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500

98%

#107

Quadro P6000

MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500

95%

#237

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

5411%

#252

L2

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500

100%

#253

FirePro W8100

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200

100%

#254

Quadro K5200

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70

100%

#256

Quadro K2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $35

98%

#257

FirePro V7800

MSRP: $759|Avg: $96

98%

#258

FirePro W8000

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

97%

#259

Quadro K2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $500

97%

#260

GRID P4-8Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200

97%

#262

FirePro 3D V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $30

94%

#263

GRID M40

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100

92%

#264

GRID P40-8Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

92%

#265

GRID M3-3020

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

92%

#266

FirePro V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

91%

#267

FirePro V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $15

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce MX570 A is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The GeForce MX570 A likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K5200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce MX570 A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K5200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce MX570 A	Quadro K5200
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity	Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro K5200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $70 versus $300 for the GeForce MX570 A, it costs 77% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 324.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce MX570 A	Quadro K5200
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+324.5%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)	✅More affordable ($70)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce MX570 A Benchmark Check

Quadro K5200 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and Quadro K5200

GeForce MX570 A

The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Quadro K5200

The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 and the Quadro K5200 reaches 6,149 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the Quadro K5200 uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 2,304 (Quadro K5200). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 771 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX570 A	Quadro K5200
G3D Mark Score	6,208	6,149
Architecture	Ampere	Kepler
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048	2304+13%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS+33%	3.553 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1155 MHz+50%	771 MHz
ROPs	40	48+20%
TMUs	64	192+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce MX570 A	Quadro K5200
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX570 A comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5200 has 8 GB. The Quadro K5200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570 A) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K5200) — a 119.8% advantage for the Quadro K5200. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	GeForce MX570 A	Quadro K5200
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	96 GB/s	211 GB/s+120%
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the Quadro K5200's 150W — a 142.9% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 350W (Quadro K5200). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce MX570 A	Quadro K5200
TDP	25W-83%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	248.3+506%	41.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX570 A launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Quadro K5200 launched at $2250 and now averages $70. The Quadro K5200 costs 76.7% less ($230 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 87.8 (Quadro K5200) — the Quadro K5200 offers 324.2% better value. The GeForce MX570 A is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).