
GeForce MX570 A vs Radeon Pro 570

GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX570 A is positioned at rank 239 and the Radeon Pro 570 is on rank 78, so the Radeon Pro 570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570 A
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce MX570 A uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce MX570 A likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 570 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX570 A.
| Insight | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $300 for the GeForce MX570 A, it costs 67% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 206.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+206.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and Radeon Pro 570

GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1105 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 6,337+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+14% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+19% | 3.96 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz+5% | 1105 MHz |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+355% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 131% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-79% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 248.3+370% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 A launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300 and now averages $100. The Radeon Pro 570 costs 66.7% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 63.4 (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 206.3% better value. The GeForce MX570 A is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $100-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7 | 63.4+206% |
| Codename | GA107 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #387 | #382 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













