GeForce MX570 A vs RTX A500 Embedded GPU
GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX570 A is positioned at rank 239 and the RTX A500 Embedded GPU is on rank 122, so the RTX A500 Embedded GPU offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570 A
Performance Per Dollar RTX A500 Embedded GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX570 A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A500 Embedded GPU.
| Insight | GeForce MX570 A | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce MX570 A remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and RTX A500 Embedded GPU
GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
RTX A500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 435 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,197 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 and the RTX A500 Embedded GPU reaches 6,197 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the RTX A500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 2,048 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 5.468 TFLOPS (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1335 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce MX570 A) vs 16 (RTX A500 Embedded GPU) with 64 Tensor cores vs 64.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 6,197 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 5.468 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1335 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the RTX A500 Embedded GPU's 20W — a 22.2% difference. The RTX A500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 350W (RTX A500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | RTX A500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 20W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 82mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 248.3 | 309.9+25% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX570 A and RTX A500 Embedded GPU
