
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

GeForce MX570 A
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs GeForce MX570 A Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs GeForce MX570 A FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs GeForce MX570 A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX570 A across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 30W vs 25W.
GeForce MX570 A
2022Why buy it
- ✅7.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 30W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs GeForce MX570 A Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,314 points.

GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q scores 6,314 and the GeForce MX570 A reaches 6,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is built on Turing while the GeForce MX570 A uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A). Raw compute: 2.304 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A). Boost clocks: 1125 MHz vs 1155 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,314+2% | 6,208 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.304 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS+105% |
| Boost Clock | 1125 MHz | 1155 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570 A) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and 64-bit on the GeForce MX570 A. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs 2 MB (GeForce MX570 A) — the GeForce MX570 A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s+17% | 96 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q draws 30W versus the GeForce MX570 A's 25W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs 350W (GeForce MX570 A). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 25W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 210.5 | 248.3+18% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce MX570 A (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GeForce MX570 A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Codename | TU117 | GA107 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | Maio 2022 |
| Ranking | #383 | #387 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















