GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
VS
GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

2019Core: 930 MHzBoost: 1125 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

2020Core: 1035 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is positioned at rank 5 and the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is on rank 65, so the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

#5
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#6
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
100%
#8
90%
#9
90%
#13
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
82%
#14
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
81%
#18
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
98%
#22
Radeon RX 7700
MSRP: $449|Avg: $399
94%
#55
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
206%
#57
187%
#58
187%
#62
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
170%
#63
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
169%
#65
100%
#66
100%
#68
GeForce GTX 850M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
97%
#78
Radeon HD 8970M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $170
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650 Max-QGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,314 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,309 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q scores 6,314 and the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design reaches 6,309 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 2.304 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1125 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Max-QGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score
6,314
6,309
Architecture
Turing
Turing
Process Node
12 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1024
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.304 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS+7%
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
1200 MHz+7%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
64
L1 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Max-QGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Max-QGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
112 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Max-QGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Max-QGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
Encoder
NVENC (Turing)
NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
NVDEC (4th Gen)
NVDEC (4th Gen)
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design's 50W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Max-QGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
TDP
30W-40%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
210.5+67%
126.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Max-QGeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
Avg Price (30d)
$100
Codename
TU117
TU117
Release
April 23 2019
April 2 2020
Ranking
#383
#371