GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Tesla M6

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Tesla M6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Tesla M6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

2019

Why buy it

✅Tesla M6 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Tesla M6

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (6,314 vs 6,225), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Tesla M6 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla M6 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Tesla M6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,314 points.

Tesla M6

The Tesla M6 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,225 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q scores 6,314 and the Tesla M6 reaches 6,225 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is built on Turing while the Tesla M6 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs 1,536 (Tesla M6). Raw compute: 2.304 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs 3.625 TFLOPS (Tesla M6). Boost clocks: 1125 MHz vs 1180 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	Tesla M6
G3D Mark Score	6,314+1%	6,225
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024	1536+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.304 TFLOPS	3.625 TFLOPS+57%
Boost Clock	1125 MHz	1180 MHz+5%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	64	96+50%
L1 Cache	1 MB+79%	0.56 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla M6 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	Tesla M6
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and 256-bit on the Tesla M6. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs 2 MB (Tesla M6) — the Tesla M6 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	Tesla M6
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs 12 (Tesla M6). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	Tesla M6
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs NVENC 5th Gen (Tesla M6). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	Tesla M6
Encoder	NVENC (Turing)	NVENC 5th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC (4th Gen)	NVDEC 2nd Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q draws 30W versus the Tesla M6's 100W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs 350W (Tesla M6). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	Tesla M6
TDP	30W-70%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	210.5+238%	62.3

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (2019 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	Tesla M6
MSRP	—	$1000
Codename	TU117	GM204
Release	April 23 2019	August 30 2015
Ranking	#383	#388

Search GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on Amazon

Search Tesla M6 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.