GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro 570

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro 570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro 570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

2019

Why buy it

✅Radeon Pro 570 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 30W instead of 120W, a 90W reduction.
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon Pro 570

2017

Why buy it

✅14.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌300% higher power demand at 120W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro 570 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (6,337 vs 6,314), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 570 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 570 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro 570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,314 points.

Radeon Pro 570

The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q scores 6,314 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 2.304 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 1125 MHz vs 1105 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	Radeon Pro 570
G3D Mark Score	6,314	6,337
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1024	1792+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.304 TFLOPS	3.96 TFLOPS+72%
Boost Clock	1125 MHz+2%	1105 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	112+75%
L1 Cache	1 MB+127%	0.44 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 570 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	Radeon Pro 570
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 570. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	Radeon Pro 570
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q draws 30W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	Radeon Pro 570
TDP	30W-75%	120W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	210.5+299%	52.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (2019 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	Radeon Pro 570
MSRP	—	$300
Codename	TU117	Polaris 20
Release	April 23 2019	June 5 2017
Ranking	#383	#382

Search GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 570 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.