GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design vs GeForce MX570 A

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is positioned at rank 65 and the GeForce MX570 A is on rank 239, so the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

#19

Radeon RX 5600

MSRP: $229|Avg: $150

98%

#22

Radeon RX 7700

MSRP: $449|Avg: $399

94%

#55

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

206%

#57

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

187%

#58

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

187%

#62

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

170%

#63

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

169%

#65

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

100%

#66

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

100%

#68

GeForce GTX 850M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

97%

#78

Radeon HD 8970M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $170

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570 A

#54

Radeon RX 6800S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

96%

#228

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

525%

#230

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

476%

#231

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

474%

#235

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

431%

#236

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

428%

#238

Arc Graphics 130T

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

100%

#239

GeForce MX570 A

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

100%

#241

GeForce GT 645

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

98%

#251

GeForce 720A

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

93%

#252

GeForce GT 520M

MSRP: $60|Avg: N/A

91%

#253

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE

MSRP: $99|Avg: $60

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX570 A.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce MX570 A
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $300 for the GeForce MX570 A, it costs 67% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 204.9% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce MX570 A
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+204.9%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($100)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

GeForce MX570 A Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design and GeForce MX570 A

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,309 points.

GeForce MX570 A

The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design scores 6,309 and the GeForce MX570 A reaches 6,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the GeForce MX570 A uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A). Raw compute: 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1155 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce MX570 A
G3D Mark Score	6,309+2%	6,208
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1024	2048+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.458 TFLOPS	4.731 TFLOPS+92%
Boost Clock	1200 MHz+4%	1155 MHz
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	64	64
L1 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce MX570 A
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570 A) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (GeForce MX570 A) — the GeForce MX570 A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce MX570 A
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s+17%	96 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design draws 50W versus the GeForce MX570 A's 25W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (GeForce MX570 A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce MX570 A
TDP	50W	25W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	126.2	248.3+97%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design costs 66.7% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 63.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) — the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design offers 204.8% better value. The GeForce MX570 A is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).