GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

2020

Why buy it

✅17.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 45.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $140 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1050 Ti instead at 6,350 vs 6,309, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,309 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 and the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design reaches 6,309 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	6,350	6,309
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	14 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	768	1024+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.138 TFLOPS	2.458 TFLOPS+15%
Boost Clock	1392 MHz+16%	1200 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	64+33%
L1 Cache	0.28 MB	1 MB+257%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s	112 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
DirectX	12_1	12 (12_1)
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	NVENC (Turing)
Decoder	NVDEC 3rd Gen	NVDEC (4th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,H.265	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design's 50W — a 33.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
TDP	70W	50W-29%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	211mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	90.7	126.2+39%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design (2020 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
MSRP	$140	—
Codename	GP107	TU117
Release	October 25 2016	April 2 2020
Ranking	#381	#371

Search GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.