
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega M GH uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GH likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX Vega M GH remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Radeon RX Vega M GH

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,350 | 6,548+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1536+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.138 TFLOPS | 3.656 TFLOPS+71% |
| Boost Clock | 1392 MHz+17% | 1190 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 96+100% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 384 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 204.8 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — a 82.9% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega M GH. Bus width: 128-bit vs 1024-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s+83% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 1024-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 35.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 211mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-30% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 211mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+38% | 65.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 MSRP and currently averages $65, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 97.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $65 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 97.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP107 | Polaris 22 |
| Release | October 25 2016 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #381 | #373 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















