GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Radeon RX Vega M GH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega M GH Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega M GH FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega M GH: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon RX Vega M GH is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 100W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega M GH across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌21000% longer card at 211mm vs 1mm.
Radeon RX Vega M GH
2018Why buy it
- ✅27.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 211mm, a 210mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 45.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 100W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega M GH Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.
Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,350 | 6,548+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1536+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.138 TFLOPS | 3.656 TFLOPS+71% |
| Boost Clock | 1392 MHz+17% | 1190 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 96+100% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 384 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX Vega M GH leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 1050 Ti gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 204.8 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — a 82.9% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega M GH. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and 1024-bit on the Radeon RX Vega M GH.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s+83% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 1024-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 35.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 211mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-30% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 211mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+38% | 65.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti came in at $140, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega M GH was 100+% cheaper ($140 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.4 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega M GH (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP107 | Polaris 22 |
| Release | October 25 2016 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #381 | #373 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Radeon RX Vega M GH
