
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon Pro 570

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 570.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $100), it costs 35% less, resulting in a 54.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+54.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($65) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Radeon Pro 570

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 1105 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,350 | 6,337 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1792+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.138 TFLOPS | 3.96 TFLOPS+85% |
| Boost Clock | 1392 MHz+26% | 1105 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 112+133% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 448 KB+56% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 52.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-42% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 211mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+72% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 MSRP and currently averages $65, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300 and now averages $100. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti costs 35% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 97.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 63.4 (Radeon Pro 570) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 54.1% better value. The Radeon Pro 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140-53% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $65-35% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 97.7+54% | 63.4 |
| Codename | GP107 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | October 25 2016 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #381 | #382 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















