
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon RX 6300M

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6300M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6300M is significantly newer (2022 vs 2016). The Radeon RX 6300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Radeon RX 6300M

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

Radeon RX 6300M
The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,350 | 6,421+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.138 TFLOPS | 3.686 TFLOPS+72% |
| Boost Clock | 1392 MHz | 2400 MHz+72% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB+13% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300M) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 32-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s+75% | 64 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+300% | 32-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs Navi 24 Media. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | — |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | Navi 24 Media |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 35W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 211mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7 | 183.5+102% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6300M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $65 | — |
| Codename | GP107 | Navi 24 |
| Release | October 25 2016 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #381 | #379 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















