
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro P3000 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $200), it costs 68% less, resulting in a 206% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+206%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($65) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Quadro P3000 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

Quadro P3000 (móvel)
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1088 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,385 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 and the Quadro P3000 (móvel) reaches 6,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the Quadro P3000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 1,280 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 3.11 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 1215 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,350 | 6,385 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1280+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.138 TFLOPS | 3.11 TFLOPS+45% |
| Boost Clock | 1392 MHz+15% | 1215 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 48 | 80+67% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 480 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P3000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the Quadro P3000 (móvel)'s 75W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro P3000 (móvel)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-7% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 211mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+7% | 85.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 MSRP and currently averages $65, while the Quadro P3000 (móvel) launched at $600 and now averages $200. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti costs 67.5% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 97.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 31.9 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 206.3% better value. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140-77% | $600 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $65-68% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 97.7+206% | 31.9 |
| Codename | GP107 | GP104 |
| Release | October 25 2016 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #381 | #380 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















