
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 7130

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 7130
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7130
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $200), it costs 68% less, resulting in a 205% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+205%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($65) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Radeon Pro WX 7130

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

Radeon Pro WX 7130
The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Raw compute: 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 1243 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,350 | 6,406 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2304+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.138 TFLOPS | 5.728 TFLOPS+168% |
| Boost Clock | 1392 MHz+12% | 1243 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 144+200% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 576 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 60% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-46% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 211mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+84% | 49.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 MSRP and currently averages $65, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000 and now averages $200. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti costs 67.5% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 97.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 32.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 205.3% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140-86% | $1000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $65-68% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 97.7+205% | 32.0 |
| Codename | GP107 | Ellesmere |
| Release | October 25 2016 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #381 | #331 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















