
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Quadro P3200 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3200 Max-Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅45.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 45.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 and the Quadro P3200 Max-Q reaches 6,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the Quadro P3200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 1404 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,350 | 6,500+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1792+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.138 TFLOPS | 5.032 TFLOPS+135% |
| Boost Clock | 1392 MHz | 1404 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 112+133% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 672 KB+133% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and 256-bit on the Quadro P3200 Max-Q. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) — the Quadro P3200 Max-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the Quadro P3200 Max-Q's 75W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-7% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 211mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+5% | 86.7 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro P3200 Max-Q (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140 | — |
| Codename | GP107 | GP104 |
| Release | October 25 2016 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #381 | #292 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















