GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
VS
GRID P40-3Q

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GRID P40-3Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

2016Core: 1291 MHzBoost: 1392 MHz
VS

GRID P40-3Q

2013Core: 745 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-3Q

#117
L40
MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174
91%
#326
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
12846%
#341
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
100%
#342
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
94%
#343
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
93%
#344
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
92%
#346
GRID M10-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
90%
#347
FirePro V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170
90%
#348
Quadro FX 3800
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
90%
#350
GRID K520
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50
85%
#351
GRID P40-12Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
84%
#352
FirePro 2270
MSRP: $149|Avg: $30
83%
#353
FirePro 2460
MSRP: $180|Avg: $10
82%
#355
FirePro 3D V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
79%
#356
Quadro FX 580
MSRP: $199|Avg: $500
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID P40-3Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.

InsightGeForce GTX 1050 TiGRID P40-3Q
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%)
Leading raw performance (+3.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $5,699), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 8374.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 1050 TiGRID P40-3Q
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+8374.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($65)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,699)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GRID P40-3Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-3Q

The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 and the GRID P40-3Q reaches 6,570 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the GRID P40-3Q uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-3Q). Raw compute: 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-3Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGRID P40-3Q
G3D Mark Score
6,350
6,570+3%
Architecture
Pascal
Kepler
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
1536+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.138 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS+7%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
128+167%
L1 Cache
288 KB+125%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGRID P40-3Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (GRID P40-3Q) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGRID P40-3Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGRID P40-3Q
DirectX
12_1
12 (11_0)
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs Tesla NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-3Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGRID P40-3Q
Encoder
NVENC 6th Gen
Tesla NVENC x24
Decoder
NVDEC 3rd Gen
Tesla NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the GRID P40-3Q's 225W — a 105.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 350W (GRID P40-3Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 211mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGRID P40-3Q
TDP
70W-69%
225W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
211mm
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
90.7+211%
29.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 MSRP and currently averages $65, while the GRID P40-3Q launched at $5699 and now averages $5699. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti costs 98.9% less ($5634 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 97.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 1.2 (GRID P40-3Q) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 8041.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGRID P40-3Q
MSRP
$140-98%
$5699
Avg Price (30d)
$65-99%
$5699
Performance per Dollar
97.7+8042%
1.2
Codename
GP107
GK104
Release
October 25 2016
June 28 2013
Ranking
#381
#628