Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GRID P40-3Q

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

2016Core: 1291 MHzBoost: 1392 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS

GRID P40-3Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GRID P40-3Q Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
4 GB 70
6,350
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 870M
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 760
brand logoGeForce GTX 680
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
GRID P40-3Q
4 GB 225
6,570
+3.5%
brand logoGeForce GTX 765M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 3GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GRID P40-3Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

2016

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $5,559 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 3834.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.4 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 70W instead of 225W, a 155W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 211mm instead of 267mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

GRID P40-3Q

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    3970.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,699 MSRPvs$140 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 45.4 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
  • ❌221.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 70W.
  • ❌26.5% longer card at 267mm vs 211mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID P40-3Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.5% in PassMark G3D (6,570 vs 6,350), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,559 cheaper on MSRP at $140 vs $5,699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3834.4% (45.4 vs 1.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID P40-3Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GRID P40-3Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-3Q

The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 and the GRID P40-3Q reaches 6,570 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the GRID P40-3Q uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-3Q). Raw compute: 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-3Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGRID P40-3Q
G3D Mark Score
6,350
6,570+3%
Architecture
Pascal
Kepler
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
1536+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.138 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS+7%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
128+167%
L1 Cache
288 KB+125%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P40-3Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGRID P40-3Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and 128-bit on the GRID P40-3Q. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (GRID P40-3Q) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGRID P40-3Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGRID P40-3Q
DirectX
12_1
12 (11_0)
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs Tesla NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-3Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGRID P40-3Q
Encoder
NVENC 6th Gen
Tesla NVENC x24
Decoder
NVDEC 3rd Gen
Tesla NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the GRID P40-3Q's 225W — a 105.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 350W (GRID P40-3Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 211mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGRID P40-3Q
TDP
70W-69%
225W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
211mm
267mm
Height
—
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
—
85°C
Perf/Watt
90.7+211%
29.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti came in at $140, while the GRID P40-3Q launched at $5699. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti was 97.5% cheaper ($5559 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.4 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 1.2 (GRID P40-3Q) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 3683.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 TiGRID P40-3Q
MSRP
$140-98%
$5699
Performance per Dollar
45.4+3683%
1.2
Codename
GP107
GK104
Release
October 25 2016
June 28 2013
Ranking
#381
#628
Search GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on AmazonSearch GRID P40-3Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.