
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs GRID P40-3Q

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Popular choices:

GRID P40-3Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-3Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-3Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $5,699), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 8374.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+8374.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($65) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,699) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GRID P40-3Q

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

GRID P40-3Q
The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 and the GRID P40-3Q reaches 6,570 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the GRID P40-3Q uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-3Q). Raw compute: 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-3Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,350 | 6,570+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1536+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.138 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS+7% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 128+167% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB+125% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (GRID P40-3Q) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs Tesla NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-3Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | Tesla NVENC x24 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | Tesla NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the GRID P40-3Q's 225W — a 105.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 350W (GRID P40-3Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 211mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-69% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 211mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+211% | 29.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 MSRP and currently averages $65, while the GRID P40-3Q launched at $5699 and now averages $5699. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti costs 98.9% less ($5634 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 97.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 1.2 (GRID P40-3Q) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 8041.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140-98% | $5699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $65-99% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 97.7+8042% | 1.2 |
| Codename | GP107 | GK104 |
| Release | October 25 2016 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #381 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















