GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

2013Core: 863 MHzBoost: 902 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

2020Core: 1035 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
GTX family
····

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

2013

Why buy it

  • 11.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

2020

Why buy it

  • GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.
  • More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3% in PassMark G3D (6,500 vs 6,309), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,309 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 and the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design reaches 6,309 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score
6,500+3%
6,309
Architecture
Kepler
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2304+125%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.156 TFLOPS+69%
2.458 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1200 MHz+33%
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
192+200%
64
L1 Cache
0.19 MB
1 MB+426%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) — a 157.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s+157%
112 GB/s
Bus Width
384-bit+200%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
TDP
250W
50W-80%
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
26.0
126.2+385%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design (2020 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
MSRP
$649
Codename
GK110B
TU117
Release
September 10 2013
April 2 2020
Ranking
#487
#371

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.