
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013Why buy it
- ✅11.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.
GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
2020Why buy it
- ✅GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,309 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 and the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design reaches 6,309 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,500+3% | 6,309 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+125% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS+69% | 2.458 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 902 MHz | 1200 MHz+33% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+200% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 1 MB+426% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) — a 157.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+157% | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 50W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0 | 126.2+385% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | — |
| Codename | GK110B | TU117 |
| Release | September 10 2013 | April 2 2020 |
| Ranking | #487 | #371 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














