GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs T600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs T600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs T600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
224.5% HIGHER MSRP
$649 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 32.1 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
❌525% higher power demand at 250W vs 40W.

T600

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $449 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 220.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.1 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 40W instead of 250W, a 210W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (6,500 vs 6,425), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

T600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

T600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $449 cheaper on MSRP at $200 vs $649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 220.8% (32.1 vs 10.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs T600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

T600

The T600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,425 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 and the T600 reaches 6,425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the T600 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 640 (T600). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1.709 TFLOPS (T600). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1335 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	T600
G3D Mark Score	6,500+1%	6,425
Architecture	Kepler	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2304+260%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.156 TFLOPS+143%	1.709 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	902 MHz	1335 MHz+48%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	192+380%	40
L1 Cache	192 KB	640 KB+233%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The T600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	T600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and 128-bit on the T600. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1 MB (T600) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	T600
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	384-bit+200%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the T600's 40W — a 144.8% difference. The T600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 350W (T600). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	T600
TDP	250W	40W-84%
Recommended PSU	600W	350W-42%
Power Connector	6-pin + 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	156mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	65°C
Perf/Watt	26.0	160.6+518%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 came in at $649, while the T600 launched at $200. On MSRP, T600 was 69.2% cheaper ($449 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.0 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 32.1 (T600) — the T600 offers 221% better value. The newer card here is T600 (2021 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	T600
MSRP	$649	$200-69%
Performance per Dollar	10.0	32.1+221%
Codename	GK110B	TU117
Release	September 10 2013	May 6 2021
Ranking	#487	#378

Search GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on Amazon

Search T600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.