GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX 6300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300M

#28

Radeon RX 6650M XT

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

100%

#30

Radeon 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

95%

#31

Radeon RX 8050S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

94%

#88

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

254%

#90

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

230%

#91

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

229%

#95

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

209%

#96

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

207%

#98

Radeon RX 6300M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#100

GeForce 945M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $98

99%

#103

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

97%

#105

GeForce GTX 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

96%

#106

Radeon HD 7470M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $12

95%

#110

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX 6300M is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The Radeon RX 6300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6300M.

Insight	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon RX 6300M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6300M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and Radeon RX 6300M

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 2400 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon RX 6300M
G3D Mark Score	6,500+1%	6,421
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2304+200%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.156 TFLOPS+13%	3.686 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	902 MHz	2400 MHz+166%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	192+300%	48
L1 Cache	192 KB	256 KB+33%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon RX 6300M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Native)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300M) — a 350% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2. Bus width: 384-bit vs 32-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon RX 6300M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s+350%	64 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit+1100%	32-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 150.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Mobile.