
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

Radeon RX 6300M
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX 6300M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX 6300M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX 6300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013Why buy it
- ✅20.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌614.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 35W.
Radeon RX 6300M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 250W, a 215W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX 6300M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon RX 6300M
The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,500+1% | 6,421 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+200% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS+13% | 3.686 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 902 MHz | 2400 MHz+166% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+300% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6300M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300M) — a 350% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300M. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+350% | 64 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+1100% | 32-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 150.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 35W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | Mobile |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0 | 183.5+606% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300M (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | — |
| Codename | GK110B | Navi 24 |
| Release | September 10 2013 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #487 | #379 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














