GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

2013Core: 863 MHzBoost: 902 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GH

2018Core: 1063 MHzBoost: 1190 MHz

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

2013

Why buy it

  • 2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon RX Vega M GH is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.

Radeon RX Vega M GH

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX Vega M GH instead at 6,548 vs 6,500, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GH

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1190 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2Radeon RX Vega M GH
G3D Mark Score
6,500
6,548
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2304+50%
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.156 TFLOPS+14%
3.656 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1190 MHz+32%
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
192+100%
96
L1 Cache
192 KB
384 KB+100%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX Vega M GH leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2Radeon RX Vega M GH
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 204.8 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — a 40.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and 1024-bit on the Radeon RX Vega M GH. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2Radeon RX Vega M GH
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
HBM2
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s+41%
204.8 GB/s
Bus Width
384-bit
1024-bit+167%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2Radeon RX Vega M GH
TDP
250W
100W-60%
Recommended PSU
600W
1W-100%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
Integrated
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
26.0
65.5+152%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 came in at $649, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega M GH was 100+% cheaper ($649 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.0 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega M GH (2018 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2Radeon RX Vega M GH
MSRP
$649
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
10.0
Infinity
Codename
GK110B
Polaris 22
Release
September 10 2013
February 1 2018
Ranking
#487
#373

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.