
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega M GH uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GH likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX Vega M GH remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and Radeon RX Vega M GH

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,500 | 6,548 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+50% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS+14% | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 902 MHz | 1190 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 192+100% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 384 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 204.8 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — a 40.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2. Bus width: 384-bit vs 1024-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+41% | 204.8 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 1024-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 100W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0 | 65.5+152% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 launched at $649 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 108.3 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 108.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GK110B | Polaris 22 |
| Release | September 10 2013 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #487 | #373 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















