
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

Radeon RX Vega M GH
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013Why buy it
- ✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon RX Vega M GH is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Radeon RX Vega M GH
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,500 | 6,548 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+50% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS+14% | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 902 MHz | 1190 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 192+100% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 384 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX Vega M GH leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 204.8 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — a 40.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and 1024-bit on the Radeon RX Vega M GH. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+41% | 204.8 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 1024-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 100W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0 | 65.5+152% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 came in at $649, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega M GH was 100+% cheaper ($649 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.0 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega M GH (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | GK110B | Polaris 22 |
| Release | September 10 2013 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #487 | #373 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














