GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Quadro T1000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

2013Core: 863 MHzBoost: 902 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro T1000

2019Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1455 MHz
Similar parts
·

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Quadro T1000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Quadro T1000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Quadro T1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

2013

Why buy it

  • 20.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 62.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $649 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • 400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.

Quadro T1000

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $249 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • Delivers 62.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T1000 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro T1000 instead at 6,505 vs 6,500, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro T1000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro T1000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $249 cheaper on MSRP at $400 vs $649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 62.4% (16.3 vs 10.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Quadro T1000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

NVIDIA

Quadro T1000

The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 and the Quadro T1000 reaches 6,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1455 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2Quadro T1000
G3D Mark Score
6,500
6,505
Architecture
Kepler
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1455 MHz+61%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro T1000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2Quadro T1000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and 256-bit on the Quadro T1000.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2Quadro T1000
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
384-bit+50%
256-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2Quadro T1000
TDP
250W
50W-80%
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
156mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
26.0
130.1+400%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 came in at $649, while the Quadro T1000 launched at $400. On MSRP, Quadro T1000 was 38.4% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.0 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 16.3 (Quadro T1000) — the Quadro T1000 offers 63% better value. The newer card here is Quadro T1000 (2019 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2Quadro T1000
MSRP
$649
$400-38%
Performance per Dollar
10.0
16.3+63%
Codename
GK110B
TU117
Release
September 10 2013
May 27 2019
Ranking
#487
#376

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.