
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

Radeon R9 285
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon R9 285 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon R9 285 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon R9 285: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013Why buy it
- ✅2.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌160.6% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌31.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 190W.
Radeon R9 285
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 167.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 190W instead of 250W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon R9 285 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon R9 285
The Radeon R9 285 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,680 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 and the Radeon R9 285 reaches 6,680 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 285 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,500 | 6,680+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS+26% | 3.29 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+71% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 448 KB+133% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 285 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285) — a 63.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+64% | 176 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 285's 190W — a 27.3% difference. The Radeon R9 285 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 190W-24% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 221mm |
| Height | — | 109mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0 | 35.2+35% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 came in at $649, while the Radeon R9 285 launched at $249. On MSRP, Radeon R9 285 was 61.6% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.0 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 26.8 (Radeon R9 285) — the Radeon R9 285 offers 168% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 285 (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $249-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.0 | 26.8+168% |
| Codename | GK110B | Tonga |
| Release | September 10 2013 | September 2 2014 |
| Ranking | #487 | #365 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














