GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

2013

Why buy it

✅4.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌208.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 81W.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 81W instead of 250W, a 169W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE instead at 6,707 vs 6,500, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,707 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 and the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE reaches 6,707 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 2.657 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1038 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
G3D Mark Score	6,500	6,707+3%
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304+80%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.156 TFLOPS+56%	2.657 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	902 MHz	1038 MHz+15%
ROPs	48	48
TMUs	192+140%	80
L1 Cache	192 KB	480 KB+150%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 120 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) — a 140% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s+140%	120 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit+100%	192-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	1.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE's 81W — a 102.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
TDP	250W	81W-68%
Recommended PSU	600W	350W-42%
Power Connector	6-pin + 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	—	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	26.0	82.8+218%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
MSRP	$649	—
Codename	GK110B	GM204
Release	September 10 2013	October 7 2014
Ranking	#487	#408

Search GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.