GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs P106-100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs P106-100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs P106-100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
189.7% HIGHER MSRP
$649 MSRPvs$224 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 29.6 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

P106-100

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $425 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 195.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.6 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

P106-100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (6,628 vs 6,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

P106-100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $425 cheaper on MSRP at $224 vs $649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 195.4% (29.6 vs 10.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, P106-100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs P106-100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

P106-100

The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 and the P106-100 reaches 6,628 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the P106-100 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1,920 (P106-100). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	P106-100
G3D Mark Score	6,500	6,628+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	2304+20%	1920
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.156 TFLOPS	6.655 TFLOPS+60%
Boost Clock	902 MHz	1733 MHz+92%
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	192+60%	120
L1 Cache	192 KB	720 KB+275%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The P106-100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	P106-100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and 128-bit on the P106-100. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 2 MB (P106-100) — the P106-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	P106-100
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	384-bit+200%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the P106-100's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The P106-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 350W (P106-100). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	P106-100
TDP	250W	75W-70%
Recommended PSU	600W	350W-42%
Power Connector	6-pin + 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	250mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	26.0	88.4+240%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 came in at $649, while the P106-100 launched at $224. On MSRP, P106-100 was 65.5% cheaper ($425 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.0 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 29.6 (P106-100) — the P106-100 offers 196% better value. The newer card here is P106-100 (2017 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	P106-100
MSRP	$649	$224-65%
Performance per Dollar	10.0	29.6+196%
Codename	GK110B	GP104
Release	September 10 2013	December 12 2017
Ranking	#487	#529

Search GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on Amazon

Search P106-100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.