
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs P106-100

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Popular choices:

P106-100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar P106-100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The P106-100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (250mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The P106-100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the P106-100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $60), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 103.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+103.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and P106-100

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

P106-100
The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 and the P106-100 reaches 6,628 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the P106-100 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1,920 (P106-100). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,500 | 6,628+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+20% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS | 6.655 TFLOPS+60% |
| Boost Clock | 902 MHz | 1733 MHz+92% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 192+60% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 720 KB+275% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 2 MB (P106-100) — the P106-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the P106-100's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The P106-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 350W (P106-100). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 250mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0 | 88.4+240% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 launched at $649 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the P106-100 launched at $224 and now averages $30. The P106-100 costs 50% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 108.3 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 220.9 (P106-100) — the P106-100 offers 104% better value. The P106-100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $224-65% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $30-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 108.3 | 220.9+104% |
| Codename | GK110B | GP104 |
| Release | September 10 2013 | December 12 2017 |
| Ranking | #487 | #529 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















