
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Popular choices:

Quadro P3000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P3000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $80), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 35.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+35.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and Quadro P3000

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

Quadro P3000
The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 and the Quadro P3000 reaches 6,384 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the Quadro P3000 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 3,840 (Quadro P3000). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,500+2% | 6,384 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3840+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS | 12.63 TFLOPS+204% |
| Boost Clock | 902 MHz | 1645 MHz+82% |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 192 | 240+25% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 1.4 MB+637% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3000 has 6 GB. The Quadro P3000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 3 MB (Quadro P3000) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the Quadro P3000's 250W — a 0% difference. The Quadro P3000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 350W (Quadro P3000). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0+2% | 25.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 launched at $649 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Quadro P3000 launched at $600 and now averages $80. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 costs 25% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 108.3 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 79.8 (Quadro P3000) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 offers 35.7% better value. The Quadro P3000 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $600-8% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-25% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 108.3+36% | 79.8 |
| Codename | GK110B | GP102 |
| Release | September 10 2013 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #487 | #141 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















