
FirePro W8100
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro W8100
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌285.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,850 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 267.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
FirePro W8100
2014GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,850 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 267.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌285.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro W8100 better than GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 26 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 73 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

FirePro W8100
FirePro W8100
The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W8100 scores 6,812 and the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 reaches 6,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (FirePro W8100) vs 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2). Raw compute: 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100) vs 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,812+5% | 6,500 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.219 TFLOPS+2% | 4.156 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160 | 192+20% |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB+233% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro W8100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W8100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 has 4 GB. The FirePro W8100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (FirePro W8100) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W8100 draws 220W versus the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2's 250W — a 12.8% difference. The FirePro W8100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8100) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-12% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 87°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0+19% | 26.0 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W8100 launched at $2499 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 launched at $649. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 costs 74% less ($1850 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (FirePro W8100) vs 10.0 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 offers 270.4% better value. The FirePro W8100 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $649-74% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 10.0+270% |
| Codename | Hawaii | GK110B |
| Release | June 23 2014 | September 10 2013 |
| Ranking | #361 | #487 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












