FirePro W8100 vs Radeon 780M

FirePro W8100

2014Core: 824 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon 780M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro W8100 vs Radeon 780M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W8100 vs Radeon 780M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W8100

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 1366.7% higher power demand at 220W vs 15W.

Radeon 780M

2024

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 220W, a 205W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 780M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (6,906 vs 6,812), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 780M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W8100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro W8100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 780M has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W8100 vs Radeon 780M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W8100

The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.

AMD

Radeon 780M

The Radeon 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,906 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W8100 scores 6,812 and the Radeon 780M reaches 6,906 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (FirePro W8100) vs 768 (Radeon 780M). Raw compute: 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (Radeon 780M).

FeatureFirePro W8100Radeon 780M
G3D Mark Score
6,812
6,906+1%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
2560+233%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.219 TFLOPS
8.909 TFLOPS+111%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
160+233%
48
L1 Cache
640 KB+150%
256 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W8100Radeon 780M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W8100 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 780M carries 4 GB. FirePro W8100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W8100 and System on the Radeon 780M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (FirePro W8100) vs 2 MB (Radeon 780M) — the Radeon 780M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W8100Radeon 780M
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Bus Width
256-bit
System
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8100) vs 12.2 (Radeon 780M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro W8100Radeon 780M
DirectX
12
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 780M). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 780M).

FeatureFirePro W8100Radeon 780M
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCN 4.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W8100 draws 220W versus the Radeon 780M's 15W — a 174.5% difference. The Radeon 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8100) vs 350W (Radeon 780M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureFirePro W8100Radeon 780M
TDP
220W
15W-93%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
241mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
87°C
Perf/Watt
31.0
460.4+1385%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 780M (2024 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro W8100Radeon 780M
MSRP
$2499
Codename
Hawaii
Phoenix
Release
June 23 2014
January 31 2024
Ranking
#361
#359

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.