FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000

FirePro W8100

2014Core: 824 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P2000

2017Core: 1076 MHzBoost: 1480 MHz
Similar parts
···

FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W8100

2014

Why buy it

  • 60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 5 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 488% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,499 MSRPvs$425 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
  • 193.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 75W.
  • 19.9% longer card at 241mm vs 201mm.

Quadro P2000

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,074 less on MSRP ($425 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 501.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($425 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 220W, a 145W reduction.
  • Measures 201mm instead of 241mm, a 40mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 5 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro P2000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (6,964 vs 6,812), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W8100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 5 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P2000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,074 cheaper on MSRP at $425 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 501.1% (16.4 vs 2.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro P2000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W8100 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W8100

The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000

The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W8100 scores 6,812 and the Quadro P2000 reaches 6,964 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Quadro P2000 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (FirePro W8100) vs 1,024 (Quadro P2000). Raw compute: 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100) vs 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000).

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro P2000
G3D Mark Score
6,812
6,964+2%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
2560+150%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.219 TFLOPS+39%
3.031 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+60%
40
TMUs
160+150%
64
L1 Cache
640 KB+67%
384 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1.25 MB+25%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro P2000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W8100 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 carries 5 GB. FirePro W8100 gives you 60% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W8100 and 256-bit on the Quadro P2000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (FirePro W8100) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) — the Quadro P2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro P2000
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+60%
5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1.25 MB+25%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8100) vs 12.0 (Quadro P2000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro P2000
DirectX
12
12.0
Vulkan
1.2+9%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000).

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro P2000
Encoder
VCE 2.0
NVENC 6.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W8100 draws 220W versus the Quadro P2000's 75W — a 98.3% difference. The Quadro P2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8100) vs 350W (Quadro P2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro P2000
TDP
220W
75W-66%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
201mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
87°C
Perf/Watt
31.0
92.9+200%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W8100 came in at $2499, while the Quadro P2000 launched at $425. On MSRP, Quadro P2000 was 83% cheaper ($2074 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (FirePro W8100) vs 16.4 (Quadro P2000) — the Quadro P2000 offers 507.4% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P2000 (2017 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro P2000
MSRP
$2499
$425-83%
Performance per Dollar
2.7
16.4+507%
Codename
Hawaii
GP106
Release
June 23 2014
February 6 2017
Ranking
#361
#346

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.