Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro W8100

2014Core: 824 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

2020Core: 1380 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) Performance Spectrum

FirePro W8100
8 GB 220
6,812
0.0%
brand logoRadeon 840M
brand logoRadeon RX 560 (móvel)
brand logoRadeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
brand logoRadeon R9 380
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6700S
brand logoRadeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
brand logoRadeon RX 7800 XT
GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
4 GB 50
6,968
+2.3%
brand logoGeForce GTX 750 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 580
brand logoGeForce GTX 670
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 980
brand logoRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W8100

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌340% higher power demand at 220W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅FirePro W8100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 220W, a 170W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (6,968 vs 6,812), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W8100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro W8100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W8100

The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 15 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1380 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,968 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W8100 scores 6,812 and the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) reaches 6,968 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (FirePro W8100) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Raw compute: 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100) vs 3.195 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)).

FeatureFirePro W8100GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
6,812
6,968+2%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2560+150%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.219 TFLOPS+32%
3.195 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
160+150%
64
L1 Cache
0.63 MB
1 MB+59%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W8100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro W8100GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W8100 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) carries 4 GB. FirePro W8100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W8100 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel).

FeatureFirePro W8100GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8100) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro W8100GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
DirectX
12
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)).

FeatureFirePro W8100GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
Encoder
VCE 2.0
NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
UVD 4.2
NVDEC (4th Gen)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W8100 draws 220W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)'s 50W — a 125.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8100) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 87°C vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro W8100GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
TDP
220W
50W-77%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
—
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
87°C
80°C-8%
Perf/Watt
31.0
139.4+350%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) (2020 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro W8100GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
MSRP
$2499
—
Codename
Hawaii
TU117
Release
June 23 2014
April 15 2020
Ranking
#361
#352
Search FirePro W8100 on AmazonSearch GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.