CPU
GPU
FirePro W8100
Popular choices:
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W8100 is positioned at rank 254 and the Quadro T2000 (móvel) is on rank 105, so the Quadro T2000 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8100
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W8100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W8100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro W8100 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $200 for the FirePro W8100, it costs 25% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 36.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W8100 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+36.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W8100 and Quadro T2000 (móvel)
FirePro W8100
The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W8100 scores 6,812 and the Quadro T2000 (móvel) reaches 6,959 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (FirePro W8100) vs 1,024 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 (móvel)).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,812 | 6,959+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+150% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.219 TFLOPS+15% | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+150% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1 MB+59% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W8100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) has 4 GB. The FirePro W8100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8100) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W8100 draws 220W versus the Quadro T2000 (móvel)'s 60W — a 114.3% difference. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8100) vs 350W (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 60W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 87°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0 | 116.0+274% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W8100 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) launched at $500 and now averages $150. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) costs 25% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.1 (FirePro W8100) vs 46.4 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) — the Quadro T2000 (móvel) offers 36.1% better value. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $500-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $150-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.1 | 46.4+36% |
| Codename | Hawaii | TU117 |
| Release | June 23 2014 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #361 | #319 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W8100 and Quadro T2000 (móvel)
