
FirePro W8100

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W8100
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌171.6% higher power demand at 220W vs 81W.
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 81W instead of 220W, a 139W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W8100
The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,707 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W8100 scores 6,812 and the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE reaches 6,707 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (FirePro W8100) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE). Raw compute: 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100) vs 2.657 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,812+2% | 6,707 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+100% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.219 TFLOPS+59% | 2.657 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB+33% | 480 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro W8100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W8100 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE carries 4 GB. FirePro W8100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W8100 and 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE. L2 Cache: 1 MB (FirePro W8100) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) — the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8100) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs 1st Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100) vs H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | 1st Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC | H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W8100 draws 220W versus the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE's 81W — a 92.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8100) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 87°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 81W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 87°C | 75°C-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0 | 82.8+167% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













