FirePro W8100 vs Tesla M60 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W8100 vs Tesla M60 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro W8100 vs Tesla M60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W8100
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $501 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 300W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌20% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$2,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 220W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W8100 vs Tesla M60 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro W8100
The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.
Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W8100 scores 6,812 and the Tesla M60 reaches 7,002 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (FirePro W8100) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,812 | 7,002+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.219 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2+14% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB | 768 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W8100 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M60 carries 4 GB. FirePro W8100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W8100 and 256-bit on the Tesla M60. L2 Cache: 1 MB (FirePro W8100) vs 2 MB (Tesla M60) — the Tesla M60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8100) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W8100 draws 220W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 30.8% difference. The FirePro W8100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8100) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-27% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 87°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0+33% | 23.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W8100 came in at $2499, while the Tesla M60 launched at $3000. On MSRP, FirePro W8100 was 16.7% cheaper ($501 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (FirePro W8100) vs 2.3 (Tesla M60) — the FirePro W8100 offers 17.4% better value. The newer card here is Tesla M60 (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499-17% | $3000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7+17% | 2.3 |
| Codename | Hawaii | GM204 |
| Release | June 23 2014 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #361 | #355 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W8100 and Tesla M60
