
FirePro W8100

Quadro T2000 Max-Q
FirePro W8100 vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W8100 vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W8100 vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W8100
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌450% higher power demand at 220W vs 40W.
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
2019Why buy it
- ✅FirePro W8100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T2000 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 220W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W8100 vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W8100
The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.

Quadro T2000 Max-Q
The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W8100 scores 6,812 and the Quadro T2000 Max-Q reaches 6,959 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Quadro T2000 Max-Q uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (FirePro W8100) vs 1,024 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Raw compute: 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100) vs 3.318 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 Max-Q).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,812 | 6,959+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+150% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.219 TFLOPS+27% | 3.318 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+150% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1 MB+59% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W8100 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T2000 Max-Q carries 4 GB. FirePro W8100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W8100 and 256-bit on the Quadro T2000 Max-Q.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8100) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W8100 draws 220W versus the Quadro T2000 Max-Q's 40W — a 138.5% difference. The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8100) vs 350W (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 40W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 87°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0 | 174.0+461% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro T2000 Max-Q (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro T2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | — |
| Codename | Hawaii | TU117 |
| Release | June 23 2014 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #361 | #357 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














