FirePro W8100 vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q

FirePro W8100

2014Core: 824 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

2019Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1620 MHz
Similar parts
···

FirePro W8100 vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W8100 vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W8100

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 450% higher power demand at 220W vs 40W.

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

2019

Why buy it

  • FirePro W8100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T2000 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 40W instead of 220W, a 180W reduction.
  • More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro T2000 Max-Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (6,959 vs 6,812), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro T2000 Max-Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W8100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro W8100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro T2000 Max-Q has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W8100 vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W8100

The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W8100 scores 6,812 and the Quadro T2000 Max-Q reaches 6,959 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Quadro T2000 Max-Q uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (FirePro W8100) vs 1,024 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Raw compute: 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100) vs 3.318 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 Max-Q).

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro T2000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score
6,812
6,959+2%
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2560+150%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.219 TFLOPS+27%
3.318 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
160+150%
64
L1 Cache
0.63 MB
1 MB+59%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W8100 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T2000 Max-Q carries 4 GB. FirePro W8100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W8100 and 256-bit on the Quadro T2000 Max-Q.

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro T2000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8100) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro T2000 Max-Q
DirectX
12
12.1
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q).

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Encoder
VCE 2.0
NVENC 7.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W8100 draws 220W versus the Quadro T2000 Max-Q's 40W — a 138.5% difference. The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8100) vs 350W (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro T2000 Max-Q
TDP
220W
40W-82%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
87°C
Perf/Watt
31.0
174.0+461%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro T2000 Max-Q (2019 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro T2000 Max-Q
MSRP
$2499
Codename
Hawaii
TU117
Release
June 23 2014
May 27 2019
Ranking
#361
#357

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.