
FirePro W8100

Quadro M4000
FirePro W8100 vs Quadro M4000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W8100 vs Quadro M4000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W8100 vs Quadro M4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W8100
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌215.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$791 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
Quadro M4000
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,708 less on MSRP ($791 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 209.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.4 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W8100 vs Quadro M4000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W8100
The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.

Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W8100 scores 6,812 and the Quadro M4000 reaches 6,679 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Quadro M4000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (FirePro W8100) vs 1 (Quadro M4000). Raw compute: 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,812+2% | 6,679 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+100% | 1,280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.219 TFLOPS+69% | 2.496 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB+33% | 480 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W8100 and 256-bit on the Quadro M4000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (FirePro W8100) vs 2 MB (Quadro M4000) — the Quadro M4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8100) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs 1st Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | 1st Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W8100 draws 220W versus the Quadro M4000's 100W — a 75% difference. The Quadro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8100) vs 350W (Quadro M4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 87°C vs 82°C.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 100W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 87°C | 82°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0 | 66.8+115% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W8100 came in at $2499, while the Quadro M4000 launched at $791. On MSRP, Quadro M4000 was 68.3% cheaper ($1708 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (FirePro W8100) vs 8.4 (Quadro M4000) — the Quadro M4000 offers 211.1% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M4000 (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $791-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 8.4+211% |
| Codename | Hawaii | GM204 |
| Release | June 23 2014 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #361 | #392 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














