FirePro W8100 vs Quadro M4000

FirePro W8100

2014Core: 824 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M4000

2015Core: 975 MHzBoost: 1013 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro W8100 vs Quadro M4000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W8100 vs Quadro M4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W8100

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 215.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,499 MSRPvs$791 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
  • 120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.

Quadro M4000

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,708 less on MSRP ($791 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 209.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.4 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
  • Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro W8100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (6,812 vs 6,679), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W8100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M4000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,708 cheaper on MSRP at $791 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 209.8% (8.4 vs 2.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro M4000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W8100 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W8100 vs Quadro M4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W8100

The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro M4000

The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W8100 scores 6,812 and the Quadro M4000 reaches 6,679 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Quadro M4000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (FirePro W8100) vs 1 (Quadro M4000). Raw compute: 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000).

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro M4000
G3D Mark Score
6,812+2%
6,679
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560+100%
1,280
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.219 TFLOPS+69%
2.496 TFLOPS
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160+100%
80
L1 Cache
640 KB+33%
480 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro M4000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W8100 and 256-bit on the Quadro M4000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (FirePro W8100) vs 2 MB (Quadro M4000) — the Quadro M4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro M4000
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8100) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro M4000
DirectX
12
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs 1st Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000).

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro M4000
Encoder
VCE 2.0
5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder
UVD 4.2
1st Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W8100 draws 220W versus the Quadro M4000's 100W — a 75% difference. The Quadro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8100) vs 350W (Quadro M4000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 87°C vs 82°C.

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro M4000
TDP
220W
100W-55%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
241mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
87°C
82°C-6%
Perf/Watt
31.0
66.8+115%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W8100 came in at $2499, while the Quadro M4000 launched at $791. On MSRP, Quadro M4000 was 68.3% cheaper ($1708 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (FirePro W8100) vs 8.4 (Quadro M4000) — the Quadro M4000 offers 211.1% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M4000 (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro W8100Quadro M4000
MSRP
$2499
$791-68%
Performance per Dollar
2.7
8.4+211%
Codename
Hawaii
GM204
Release
June 23 2014
August 18 2015
Ranking
#361
#392

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.